• Home
  • About
    • Contact
  • Discussion
  • Newsletter
  • Partners

  • Infrastructure
  • Safety
  • Marketing
  • Partners

Home » Safety » US Terrain Park Council (USTPC)

US Terrain Park Council (USTPC)

Posted date:  July 20, 2011  |  4 Comments



We are honored to present in this article our partner in the field of Terrain Park safety – US Terrain Park Council (USTPC): a non-profit, litigation-neutral community of Riders, Engineers, Medical Professionals, Risk Managers and Parents, stepping in to keep parks from becoming a thing of the past due to the ongoing pressures of litigation.


Partnership with US Terrain Park Council will hopefully enable us to provide you with an even more detailed and interesting content regarding terrain parks, especially from the perspective of safety, and to spread this terrain park certification into the wider European area.

Safety in Terrain Parks is raising concerns due to the lack of regulations and guidelines, however restrictive rules developed solely by engineers and other experts without including rider’s perspective may drastically limit the further development of freestyle snowboarding and skiing.

The terrain park design and construction community around the world is unbelievably advanced, but historically there has not been much engineering in the park design. Many of the best designers have a very good sense of the scale and speed, but it’s still exposing a resort to potential litigation” says USTPC Board Director Adrian Wisniewski.

Until now there has been little done in the area of Terrain Park safety that is why ski resorts are getting dragged into court to defend their park and the message is becoming loud and clear – if you design, construct or maintain a terrain park in a manner that can be deemed outside of an inherent risk of the sport, you could be found liable. Most of these cases are in the 10’s of millions of dollars range and if they continue, terrain parks are at risk of being flattened at every resort. Regardless of the jury’s decision, hundreds of thousands of dollars are being spent on legal expenses that must be made up elsewhere.

Parks that are being designed with industry ‘best practices’ have no way to prove it in a court of law. Although many resorts document proper maintenance, without a third party certifier, it becomes one lawyer’s word against another. When someone is severely injured in a park and a lawyer looks into the potential case, there has been nothing to protect the terrain park manager, the ski resort staff and the insurance company from litigation. If these lawsuits continue, resorts will be forced to quit building terrain parks altogether or “standardize” them to the point of diluting any creativity.


Most of us remember when the majority of terrain parks in the country were shut down in the spring of 2007 due to a major lawsuit” Wisniewski continues. “The USTPC is protecting the existence of terrain parks by implementing engineering criteria, along with providing third party certification to ensure that a resort is doing its best to minimize risk. It’s really pretty simple.”

In an effort to recognize and reward the resorts, the USTPC has created a set of criteria along with a certification process, Smart Parks Certification,which help guide the resort.


“The Smart Parks Certification program sets resorts up for success,” says Dr. Jim McNeil of the USTPC. “The criteria are meant to let Terrain Park Managers and Risk Management sleep better at night knowing they are doing the best they can. USTPC takes the guess-work out of it.” Dr McNeil, President and Board Director of USTPC, is a Physics Professor at the Colorado School of Mines.

He first got involved in the physics of park safety when his son would come home banged up from a day of riding park. “He would complain of landing flat, usually due to over or under shooting the landing; so I decided to formulate a physics model that predicts the impact on a skier or snowboarder, allowing for smarter designs. It took into account the “pop” of the rider, the temperature of the snow, the take-off and landing angles, wind, etc. It became obvious, that with some minor adjustments to particular characteristics of the jump, along with designated roll-in spot, the ability to land in the “sweet spot” increased drastically, thereby reducing the impact on a rider significantly.”

In further research, he found that the industry did not employ engineering design or have a developed set of “best practices”. “I was very surprised to hear that there is currently little to no engineering being incorporated in terrain parks” says McNeil. “For an activity that reaches so many people throughout the world, with such high risks, there should be, at the very least, some basic design engineering before a park is open to the public. So I started to gather as many industry and technical experts as possible to see if we can make a change for the better. This is where the USTPC begun and it’s been amazing to see the reaction from pro-riders who have been asking for this for years. Just a few changes to the park features can make an amazing difference and put a lot of minds at ease.”

The USTPC created its Board of Directors, which includes pro-riders, engineers, doctors, architects, youth mentors and more. They came up with a set of “Criteria” and posted it to their quickly growing online membership who in turn voices their opinion on each of the proposed Criteria. The Board then votes on the Criteria that will make it into the Smart Parks Certification process for that upcoming winter season. “It’s an incredibly open and academic process that strives to listen to the entire voice of the industry’ says Wisniewski. “The Criteria not only need to minimize the risk to park patrons, but it has to work in the real world with the cat drivers.”


Will park patrons still be injured in terrain parks? Of course”, says Wisniewski. “People get hurt walking down the stairs every day, and terrain parks are no different. Sending your body off of a jump 50 feet in the air is always going to have a level of risk. But will they be exposed to liability in the way they were in the past? Absolutely not. The resorts now have the ability to rest assured knowing their park is Smart Park Certified.

For more information on USTPC and Smart Parks Certification please follow this link.


    Share This




4 Comments for US Terrain Park Council (USTPC)

N Gibbons

This is Awesome! The industry needed this!!!

Reply

Adrian Wisniewski

This partnership is great. Really looking forward to see what these two great groups can achieve together. Researching terrain park safety and the physics of park features is long overdue.
Congratulations to both organizations for taking these steps towards protecting kids and resorts.

Reply

josh martinez

it doesn’t matter how “safe” you try to build a park, someone is going to get hurt. i don’t see how you guys are going to change the situation by saying its USTPC approved, how are you going to stop some sew hungry person or parent from trying to get some money from a mistake or bad judgment call made by that person or there child in the park? i understand trying to make parks safer for people of different skill levels, but that’s why there are beginner, intermediate and advanced parks, which most resorts have. no matter what you do to a park there is going to be risk, but it seems to me that all your going to do is put a bunch of rules and regulations in place that will keep park builders from being creative and pretty much make park progression a thing of the past. does this physics teacher Dr.McNeil even ride? does he understand how many variables are involved in building a park? it takes a lot of work to keep a park in good shape. constant weather changes, a riders size, does the rider wax his board properly or not, does the rider even know what they are doing? way to many variables to take into account. you can not standardize parks, all you will do is destroy creativity and progression. i do not want to go to a resort and see the same set up as the last one i went to, its boring. is this professor going to set up a feature then test it himself? lets see how that works out. as a park builder i have to test everything i design and build. you have to know how to ride to know how to set up a feature properly, even then its sometimes trial and error, i personally think this could hurt the industry, it has already postponed the construction of a park in Fairbanks Alaska at UAF for a whole year!!! all im saying is its not science, its art and sometimes its going to be messy. you cant guarantee a safe park and unless USTPC has some kind or government policy backing it that protects resorts and builders from lawsuits, its not going to do a hole lot of good. it doesn’t matter how perfect you think your park is there is always going to be somebody who makes a mistake and gets hurt. having ten years of experience snowboarding and several years of park building under my belt i think i understand what it takes and what is involved in a terrain park and i can tell you that hard work, creativity and love for riding is the only equation for a good park . thanks for your time,
josh

Reply

Andrej

Here is the short handout from my conversation with Dr.Mcneil – as a park designer and developer I had sililar thoughts that you have:
First of all, we never say that a jump is “safe”. There is no such
thing as a “safe” jump. When the rider leaves the ground he can always be injured on impact.
Similarly, we can never “guarantee” that no one will be injured. The safety of a jump is
a partnership between the rider and the jump. The things the rider does are controlled by the rider and often riders can make poor decisions or lack sufficient skill to execute a maneuver
properly. While these things are not under the control of the jump designer, there are
things the designer can do to mitigate the bad decisions or insufficient skill. For example, designing curvature in the takeoff will lead to a tendency to invert (“backseat”) the rider.
This is not a decision the rider makes at takeoff, but something that the designer put into
the takeoff. A skilled rider can compensate for this effect, but a beginner may find himself,
tragically, inverted. Another way to become inverted is when, in the
spring time when the snow becomes soft, it is common practice (where allowed) to salt the
transition and takeoff. When the salted snow sets up, it is quite firm and fast. A rider not
recognizing the transition from slow snow to fast can also become inverted. These are
things that are controllable by the designer and the maintenance crews.
How the rider lands is the responsibility of the rider. How hard they land
is, to some degree, under the control of the designer. It is this second aspect of the safety partnership that is largely missing at all the major U.S. resorts today. Due to our perverse legal environment, they believe that it is in their best legal interest to place ALL responsibility for safety on the rider (at least officially). The other
important component of minimizing EFH is the length of the landing
area which must be long enough to accommodate the expected maximum speeds from the
designed run -in. One can get into problems of over-shooting the landing when no thought is given to the start point, range of friction coefficients, and angle of run-in which leads to potential terminal velocities that put the rider beyond the landing area.

Hopefully we can continue the discussion on this topic,…

Reply






Wanna say something?





  Cancel Reply

« Promoting bike parks
Skill levels in Terrain parks »
  • Recent Posts

    • Should technical parts and technical trail features be removed from trails?
      During the last couple of years it has often happened that technical trail features...
    • Generation Y, Sponsorships and Action Sports - the basics of successful sponsorships in action sports
      In our last article we have discussed how action sports gain popularity among members...
    • Generation Y, Sponsorships and Action Sports - Introduction
      For most companies it is hard to influence members of the generation Y which is why we decided...



 

 
Copyright ASR-SIG © 2011. All Rights Reserved.